Watch Dilwale 2. 01. Free Full Online Movie HD. ![]() Physician- Assisted Suicide Endangers the Weak, Corrupts Medicine, Compromises the Family, and Violates Human Dignity and Equality. March 2. 4, 2. 01. Backgrounder on Health Care. Better, Smarter, Healthier: In historic announcement, HHS sets clear goals and timeline for shifting Medicare reimbursements from volume to value. By Ryan T. Anderson, Ph. D. Allowing physician- assisted suicide would be a grave mistake for four reasons. First, it would endanger the weak and vulnerable. Second, it would corrupt the practice of medicine and the doctor–patient relationship. Third, it would compromise the family and intergenerational commitments. And fourth, it would betray human dignity and equality before the law. Instead of helping people to kill themselves, we should offer them appropriate medical care and human presence. We should respond to suffering with true compassion and solidarity. Doctors should help their patients to die a dignified death of natural causes, not assist in killing. Physicians are always to care, never to kill. Key Points. Doctors may help their patients to die a dignified death from natural causes, but they should not kill their patients or help them to kill themselves. This is the reality behind euphemisms such as “death with dignity” and “aid in dying.”. Physician- assisted suicide (PAS) endangers the weak and marginalized in society. Where it has been allowed, safeguards purporting to minimize this risk have proved inadequate. PAS corrupts the profession of medicine by permitting the tools of healing to be used as techniques for killing, it distorts the doctor–patient relationship, and it provides perverse incentives for insurance providers. PAS undermines social solidarity, increasing the temptation to view elderly or disabled family members as burdens and the temptation for those family members to view themselves as burdens. PAS violates equality before the law by judging some to have lives no longer “worth living.”. We should respond to suffering with appropriate medical care and human presence. ![]() ![]() The Hippocratic Oath proclaims: “I will keep [the sick] from harm and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.â€[1] This is an essential precept for a flourishing civil society. No one, especially a doctor, should be permitted to kill intentionally, or assist in killing intentionally, an innocent neighbor. Human life need not be extended by every medical means possible, but a person should never be intentionally killed. Doctors may help their patients to die a dignified death from natural causes, but they should not kill their patients or help them to kill themselves. This is the reality that such euphemisms as “death with dignity†and “aid in dying†seek to conceal. In 2. 01. 5, at least 1. District of Columbia are considering whether to allow physician- assisted suicide (PAS).[2] Legalizing physician- assisted suicide, however, would be a grave mistake because it would: Endanger the weak and vulnerable, Corrupt the practice of medicine and the doctor–patient relationship, Compromise the family and intergenerational commitments, and Betray human dignity and equality before the law. First, PAS endangers the weak and marginalized in society. Where it has been allowed, safeguards purporting to minimize this risk have proved to be inadequate and have often been watered down or eliminated over time. People who deserve society’s assistance are instead offered accelerated death. Second, PAS changes the culture in which medicine is practiced. It corrupts the profession of medicine by permitting the tools of healing to be used as techniques for killing. By the same token, PAS threatens to fundamentally distort the doctor–patient relationship because it reduces patients’ trust of doctors and doctors’ undivided commitment to the life and health of their patients. Moreover, the option of PAS would provide perverse incentives for insurance providers and the public and private financing of health care. Physician- assisted suicide offers a cheap, quick fix in a world of increasingly scarce health care resources. A World Without Work. For centuries, experts have predicted that machines would make workers obsolete. That moment may finally be arriving. Could that be a good thing? (CNN)Donald Trump talked about his Christian faith Saturday, but said he's never sought forgiveness for his sins. Trump, who also made headlines for. ![]() Third, PAS would harm our entire culture, especially our family and intergenerational obligations. The temptation to view elderly or disabled family members as burdens will increase, as will the temptation for those family members to internalize this attitude and view themselves as burdens. Physician- assisted suicide undermines social solidarity and true compassion. Fourth, PAS’s most profound injustice is that it violates human dignity and denies equality before the law. Every human being has intrinsic dignity and immeasurable worth. For our legal system to be coherent and just, the law must respect this dignity in everyone. It does so by taking all reasonable steps to prevent the innocent, of any age or condition, from being devalued and killed. Classifying a subgroup of people as legally eligible to be killed violates our nation’s commitment to equality before the law—showing profound disrespect for and callousness to those who will be judged to have lives no longer “worth living,†not least the frail elderly, the demented, and the disabled. No natural right to PAS exists, and arguments for such a right are incoherent: A legal system that allows assisted suicide abandons the natural right to life of all its citizens. Instead of embracing PAS, we should respond to suffering with true compassion and solidarity. People seeking PAS typically suffer from depression or other mental illnesses, as well as simply from loneliness. Instead of helping them to kill themselves, we should offer them appropriate medical care and human presence. For those in physical pain, pain management and other palliative medicine can manage their symptoms effectively.
For those for whom death is imminent, hospice care and fellowship can accompany them in their last days. Anything less falls short of what human dignity requires. The real challenge facing society is to make quality end- of- life care available to all. Doctors should help their patients to die a dignified death of natural causes, not assist in killing. Physicians are always to care, never to kill. They properly seek to alleviate suffering, and it is reasonable to withhold or withdraw medical interventions that are not worthwhile. However, to judge that a patient’s life is not worthwhile and deliberately hasten his or her end is another thing altogether. Citizens and policymakers need to resist the push by pressure groups, academic elites, and the media to sanction PAS. Recent experience with PAS both in the United States and in Europe suggests how problematic it is. Endangering the Weak and Marginalized To understand how PAS endangers the weak and marginalized, one must understand what PAS entails and where it leads. With PAS, a doctor prescribes the deadly drug, but the patient self- administers it. While most activists in the United States publicly call only for PAS, they have historically advocated not only PAS, but also euthanasia: the intentional killing of the patient by a doctor. This is not surprising: The arguments for PAS are equally arguments for euthanasia. Neil Gorsuch, currently a federal judge, points out that some contemporary activists fault the movement for not being honest about where its arguments lead. He notes that legal theorist and New York University School of Law Professor Richard Epstein “has charged his fellow assisted suicide advocates who fail to endorse the legalization of euthanasia openly and explicitly with a ‘certain lack of courage.’â€[3]The logic of assisted suicide leads to euthanasia because if “compassion†demands that some patients be helped to kill themselves, it makes little sense to claim that only those who are capable of self- administering the deadly drugs be given this option. Should not those who are too disabled to kill themselves have their suffering ended by a lethal injection? And what of those who are too disabled to request that their suffering be ended, such as infants or the demented? Why should they be denied the “benefit†of a hastened death? Does not “compassion†provide an even more compelling reason for a doctor to provide this release from suffering and indignity?[4] As Professor John Keown points out: If compassion justified us in giving a lethal prescription to a terminally ill patient on request to end their suffering, it would equally justify us in giving them a lethal injection, particularly if they were physically unable to commit suicide. It would also justify us in giving a lethal injection to a terminally ill patient who was incapable of making a request.[5]Judge Gorsuch notes that for the Dutch, “it is the physician’s assessment of the patient’s quality of life as ‘degrading’ or ‘deteriorating’ or ‘hopeless’ that stands as the ultimate justification for killing.â€[6]Although the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in two unanimous decisions that there is no constitutional right to PAS, three states permit it by statute: Oregon, Washington, and Vermont.[7] Physician- assisted suicide and euthanasia are allowed in three European countries—the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg—and Switzerland allows assisted suicide.[8]The evidence from these jurisdictions, particularly the Netherlands, which has over 3. In the Netherlands, several official, government- sponsored surveys have disclosed both that in thousands of cases, doctors have intentionally administered lethal injections to patients without a request and that in thousands of cases, they have failed to report cases to the authorities.[9]Physician- Assisted Suicide Will Most Threaten the Weak and Marginalized. Physician- assisted suicide will most threaten the weak and marginalized because of the cultural pressures and economic incentives that will drive it.[1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2019
Categories |